This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While linking corporate debt to sustainability targets sounds like a great way of incentivizing companies to make environmental, social and governance (ESG) improvements, a lack of standardized rules has quickly opened the door to greenwashing, with some companies using the funds to continue business as usual with little ESG impact. .
A coalition of environmental groups is calling on the federal government to regulate climate commitments made by banks and other financial institutions to avoid greenwashing and accelerate change. . The post Advocates urge regulation of banks’ climate commitments to avoid greenwashing appeared first on Corporate Knights.
Global issuance of labelled sustainable bonds including green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked, and transition bonds is anticipated to again reach around $1 trillion in 2025, according to a new forecast released by Moodys Ratings, as headwinds including political changes from the new U.S. Moodys noted that even as the new U.S.
by 2025, Dewing says, especially along its Atlantic coast. Greenwashing risk Critics see plastic credit systems as little more than window dressing, giving firms an excuse to continue making and using plastic rather than finding alternatives. ACC’s Dewing counters that “people say this is greenwashing.
The Council stated that the proposals form part of efforts to prevent greenwashing, or the mischaracterization or exaggeration of the sustainability characteristics and attributes of financial products and services. Click here to access the greenwashing position paper and the sustainable finance report.
Biodiversity credits are going to explode in scale and 2025 will be a critical year,” Simon Zadek, Founder of non-profit NatureFinance, told ESG Investor. The post Boom or Bust for Biodiversity Credits in 2025 appeared first on ESG Investor.
Firms with assets under management greater than £50 billion would be required to begin providing product-level disclosures under the SDR from December 2025, and those with AUM greater than £5 billion from December 2026. Our good and poor practice anti-greenwashing examples will help firms market their products in the right way.”
The new rules form part of the FCA’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR), introduced by the regulator in November 2023 , aimed at helping investors assess the sustainability attributes of investment products, and to avoid greenwashing risk, to portfolio managers.
The new measures include an anti-greenwashing rule, applying to all communication by FCA-authorized firms about the environmental or social characteristics of financial products or services, aimed at ensuring that the claims made “are fair, clear, and not misleading, and consistent with the sustainability profile of the product or service.”
The UK government announced the publication of draft legislation, aimed at regulating providers of ESG ratings, with plans to proceed with introducing a finalized law to Parliament in early 2025. The new proposed law would place ESG ratings providers under the supervision of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The CSRD took effect from the beginning of 2024 for large public-interest companies with over 500 employees, followed by companies with more than 250 employees or €40 million in revenue in 2025, and is slated to take effect for listed SMEs in 2026.
Food brands should keep this in mind as they plan for 2025, particularly when it comes to their sustainability goals, because global trade trends will have consequences for Americans wallets and values. Fairtrade America forecasts the following trends for 2025 and calls on brands to strategize around them as the New Year approaches.
The Stand.earth complaint outlined a series of alleged “false or misleading public representations” made by lululemon in the context of its Be Planet program.
Tim Nash, founder, Good Investing Morningstar says that after three years of high growth, managers are being more selective and tactical in their approach ahead of anti-greenwashing regulations in the United Kingdom and Europe. Retail investors push for green funds Its not all doom and gloom. Illustrations by C.J.
Cancelling oil industry greenwash There’s a growing consensus that the PR companies involved in greenwashed campaigns need to be held to account. Addressing the UN General Assembly in 2022, Secretary-General António Guterres took aim at the “massive PR machine raking in billions to shield the fossil fuel industry from scrutiny.”
ESMA launched the new rules after noting a sharp increase in the use of sustainability-related terms in fund names in Europe over the past several years, leading to an increased risk of greenwashing. The new guidelines come into effect on May 21, 2025.
The FCA’s SDR requirements were introduced by the regulator in November 2023 , aimed at helping investors assess the sustainability attributes of investment products, and to avoid greenwashing risk, to portfolio managers.
New nature legislation and updated modern slavery act are also key priorities ahead of 2025 federal elections. Next year, Australia is due to finalise its first National Climate Risk Assessment and National Adaptation Plan , which will replace the National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy 2021–2025.
ESMA launched the new rules after noting a sharp increase in the use of sustainability-related terms in fund names in Europe over the past several years, leading to an increased risk of greenwashing. The new guidelines come into effect on May 21, 2025.
In fact, ESG investing is on track to exceed $50 trillion by 2025[1]—serious money that would represent more than a third of all projected global assets under management. Trillion of Global AUM by 2025, Finds Bloomberg Intelligence,” July 2021. [2] ESG is no passing fad. The second question is more complex.
Dr Rory Sullivan, CEO of Chronos Sustainability, considers what a reshaped world means for sustainable finance in 2025. The world will look very different in 2025. The economics support sustainability One of the reasons for optimism in 2025 is because many of the actions we want to encourage are already supported by the economics.
The FCAs SDR requirements were introduced by the regulator in November 2023 , aimed at helping investors assess the sustainability attributes of investment products, and to avoid greenwashing risk, to portfolio managers.
Industry experts have warned that that the timeline for implementation of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) anti-greenwashing rule could be challenging for asset managers and other regulated firms. The post Tight Timeline for FCA Anti-greenwashing Rule appeared first on ESG Investor.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) announced that it has commenced work on the development of a new international standard on net zero, aimed at providing clarity and credibility to organizations’ net zero targets and strategies, and to guard against greenwashing.
RELATED Canadian investors stand firm on ESG despite greenhushing trend, report finds The anti-DEI movement confronts an unlikely opponent: big banks Meet the four most sustainable funds on the market for 2025 Deadlines to submit reports starting in 2026 will be pushed back to 2028.
In 2022-23 Anheuser-Busch InBev quietly stopped running Facebook advertisements that referred to its goals of net zero emissions by 2040 and 100% recycled packaging by 2025. Such greenwashing accusations are increasingly commonplace – in the US alone, a dozen greenwashing lawsuits have been filed every year since 2020.
As predicted by the Climate Bonds Initiative , green bonds have returned to growth and could reach the ambitious level of $5 trillion a year starting in 2025. How high is the risk of greenwashing? As interest in environmental, social and governance sustainability has grown, so as the risk of greenwashing.
For a long time it remained something of a buzz phrase, understood by few and cared about by even fewer, but in recent years ESG has morphed into a global phenomenon with ESG assets tipped to surpass US$41 trillion in 2022 and US$50 trillion by 2025 — one-third of the projected total assets under management globally.
The ruling comes as financial institutions and other companies increasingly face regulatory scrutiny over greenwashing concerns. Earlier this year, the CEO of Deutsche Bank’s investment arm DWS resigned after police raided the firms’ Frankfurt offices as part of an investigation into greenwashing allegations.
This week in ESG news: Microsoft signs record-breaking carbon removal deal; EY survey finds over half of CEOs say sustainability a higher priority vs one year ago; BCG sustainable aviation deal to cut 100,000 tons of emissions; ERM launches carbon credit consulting business; KKR & HASI launch $2 billion sustainable infrastructure investment partnership; (..)
New funds will have to comply with the rules from 21 November, while existing funds have until May 2025. These rules were introduced in the wake of a consultation seeking feedback on the current requirements of SFDR , which asked whether its Article 8 and 9 disclosure categories should be more formally established as fund labels.
Wider adoption of standards in regen agriculture could help prevent greenwashing but some investors fail to see the benefits, attendees at Environmental Finance's Natural Capital Investment EMEA 2025 conference heard.
Two-thirds of funds in the EU labelled with sustainable or ESG-related terms may need to sell assets or change their names to align with new anti-greenwashing rules, with stock divestments of as much as $40 billion if all were to keep their names, according to a new report released by investment research firm Morningstar.
This latest move, meant to end greenwashing and empower the European Union’s (EU) social market economy, requires companies to disclose environmental, social and governance matters that align with the EU’s climate goals. SMEs can opt out until 2028.
This could bring with it accusations of greenwashing and/or changes to the operation of existing strategies, which could be costly and cause disruption to existing investments. Next steps The consultation is open for responses until 6 February 2025.
Issuers subject to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) will also start reporting in 2025 which will make the EU Green Bond label more accessible to them , according to Linklaters.
In some instances, they may amount to so-called ‘greenwashing’ with consumers effectively being deluded into thinking their ‘energy efficient’ home represents a better outcome for the environment.”. New York, by contrast, took a more hard-edged approach with Local Law 97, which has firm 2025 deadlines and real fines.
Million to Improve Home Energy Efficiency Sustainable Investing Invesco Launches New Climate ETF with Record-Breaking $2.4 Million to Improve Home Energy Efficiency Sustainable Investing Invesco Launches New Climate ETF with Record-Breaking $2.4
Disclosure also prevents greenwashing. government announced that all companies must be TCFD-compliant by 2025. Investors cannot make apples-to-apples comparisons on sustainability information if companies do not report their data within a common framework. More recently, the U.K. Luckily, TCFD-aligned disclosure is mainstreaming.
Greenwashing vs. greenwhispering. Consumers, as well as investors , are getting better at recognizing corporate “greenwashing” — or overstating ESG efforts, including being a hero in one arena but a villain in another. Consumers aren’t the only ones with anxiety about ESG and corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance.
Indeed, several airlines have been accused or charged with greenwashing over unclear or misleading claims on emissions and environmental impact in recent months. As of 2025, airlines operating flights within the EU or departing from the EU will be able to voluntarily join this FEL initiative.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has identified the EU Green Bonds and ESG Ratings regulations, as well as preparatory work for a database including sustainability-related information, among its priorities for 2025.
Rules introduced by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) last month are expected to serve as an interim anti- greenwashing measure ahead the more expansive update to the SFDR.
billion of funding in 2025‑26 for CCUS Track-1 projects to decarbonise industry, as well as contracts with 11 green hydrogen producers worth around £2.3 Budget boost Last week, Labour’s first budget since taking office confirmed £3.9
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content