This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’m reminded of this debate amid the current turmoil over a greeninvestment label in Europe, a situation caused largely by the unwillingness of the sustainable investment sector to create its own industry standard. Werner Hoyer, president of the European InvestmentBank.
The taxonomy will be used as a benchmark for banks, pension funds and other financial institutions that have their own climate targets and want to align their lending and investment with a net-zero target for 2050. The government is expected to release that report in the coming days. C scenarios, Routledge said.
RELATED Canadian investors stand firm on ESG despite greenhushing trend, report finds The anti-DEI movement confronts an unlikely opponent: big banks Meet the four most sustainable funds on the market for 2025 Deadlines to submit reports starting in 2026 will be pushed back to 2028.
Around 90% of EU banks are exposed to climate transition risks, recent analysis from the ECB shows. Banks globally are increasingly feeling two-pronged pressure from regulators and investors to up their climate ambition and stop financing fossil fuels.
Chinese asset managers are improving ESG awareness, but weak regulation means green claims often don’t match reality, says Greenpeace. Greenwashing is a growing risk in the Chinese fund management sector, as marketing of ESG products runs ahead of standards and regulatory oversight, a new report by Greenpeace has found.
The minister commended the work of the Sustainable Finance Action Council (SFAC), a body comprising the country’s largest banks, pension funds and insurance companies that has recommended that Canadian corporations be required to disclose their climate-related risks and have a transition plan for addressing them.
In March 2022, the Network for Greening the Financial System , a coalition of more than 120 central banks and supervisors, published a new statement , acknowledging that biodiversity loss could lead to significant macroeconomic and financial stability risks. Biodiversity is also attracting the attention of financial policymakers.
ECB Climate Stress Test: Banks are Overexposed, Underprepared for Climate Risk. European Lawmakers Defeat Move to Keep Nuclear and Gas out of GreenInvestment Taxonomy. K2 Launches ESG Certification for Fund Managers to Tackle Greenwashing Risk. HKEX Forms Council to Launch International Carbon Market.
Meanwhile, most people – 79% overall and 90% of investors under age 45 – say they want to invest in socially and environmentally friendly ways. Even if they’re not actively greenwashing, most companies don’t publish information about their emissions or other environmental impacts. And more importantly, what can we do to bridge it?
European regulators have ratcheted up efforts to eliminate greenwashing from the investment sector. End of an era I – The fight against greenwashing inched ahead with the release of final guidelines for naming ESG- or sustainability-related funds by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).
Many of the difficulties stem from how multilateral development banks (MDBs) operate and interact with the private sector, but one channel for private investment flows was also flagged as problematic this week. Perhaps more significant was the African Development Bank’s US$750 million issuance, which attracted 275 investors.
There is no shortage of reference frameworks for keeping finance sector firms on a straight and narrow path to net zero; and some might raise an eyebrow at guidance from a country that has done more than most to undermine the collaborative decarbonisation efforts of banks , insurers and investors. What’s in a name?
“Our recommendations aim to align these objectives with government policy, tracking progress, consumer protection, national and local actions, private sector engagement, and international efforts,” she said. “By carefully considering these aspects, the UK can harness the power of its taxonomy to drive sustainable and greeninvestments while preventing (..)
A key amendment requires 100% of the proceeds to fund green projects, instead of 50-70% previously. This is a big step for foreign investors who are eager to invest in China’s domestic green bond market but have concerns about greenwashing—inadvertently buying ‘green’ bonds that, in fact, support non-green projects.
The EU Green Taxonomy was designed to accelerate the flow of money into green companies and projects, while simultaneously protecting investors from greenwashing accusations. However, to know the share of their loans, which are covered by the Taxonomy, they must wait for the Taxonomy reporting from the non-financial companies.
Green bonds are structurally no different to conventional bonds under the same class (with the same ranking, covenants and security package among all creditors in the case of distress). For example, in a comprehensive global green bond index , 92.0% are investment grade (4.5% are rated non-investment grade and 3.5%
ING Asset Management’s new SDG Impact Strategy will provide clients with exposure to companies that contribute specifically to the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), responding to strong demand for ‘dark green’ investments. billion from January to April.
This surrender was part of a wider pullback, as banks, investment funds and asset owners axed billions of dollars from sustainable investment funds and reined in marketing excesses. North American banks dug in on fossil fuels and pressured GFANZ to capitulate. What caused this turnaround? Canadian and U.S. In the U.S.,
The world cannot win the fight against climate change without China successfully transitioning to a low-carbon economy, with it accounting for 27% of global carbon dioxide and a third of the world’s greenhouse gases, according to the World Bank. trillion (US$3.57 trillion) growing from RMB 18.4 trillion in 2021.
The IPG’s initial commitment of US$10 billion in public finance will be matched via a Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) working group, including Bank of America, Standard Chartered and Macquarie. . Announced by Guterres in Glasgow, the UN High-Level Expert Group on the Net Zero Emissions Commitments of Non-State Entities?
Aconsequence of this pushback came on New Years Eve, when global financial behemoths Bank of America and Citigroup left the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, one of the investment industry climate coalitions championed by the United Nations. What does this mean for the year ahead?
While the intention of the EUGBS is to improve standards and reduce the risk of greenwashing is admirable, the reality is its limited scope, he adds. Tatjana Greil-Castro, Co-head of Public Markets at asset manager Muzinich, notes there are only so many greeninvestments that companies can do in a year.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content