This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I had a spirited debate with a good friend last week on carbonoffsets. Here goes… Climatechange or as I prefer to call it climate chaos, is tightening its grip on our planet. Naturally, the appeal of carbonoffsetting has skyrocketed. appeared first on Driving Sustainable Change.
It’s the characteristics of the latter that make compliance carbon markets the secret weapon against climatechange. For an example of how this happens, check out this clip from John Oliver, or this one from later in the same program Markets can be a powerful force for good when it comes to combating climatechange.
A wave of anti-“greenwashing” litigation is seeking to hold major players in the aviation industry to account for sensational claims of being sustainable, low-carbon or contributing to net zero. It’s not hard to see why the aviation industry has provoked the ire of climate activists. Why greenwashing?
Aiming to create a carbon-negative album release, they calculated the “cradle-to-grave” carbon impact of both a CD and vinyl LP from manufacturing to shipping, from its life in a fan’s stereo to its likely afterlife in a landfill 100 years from now.
Thanks to the rise in plastics pledges, an emerging and undefined market for plastic offsets is just beginning to take shape. And, much like the market for carbonoffsets, it’s messy. . The potential for greenwashing is high. Given that U.S.
A convoy of tractors was making its way to a Dutch government building in February when Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted out his support for farmers revolting against the EU’s regulatory push to drive down climate emissions: “I’m pro-environment, but I support the farmers! Farming has no material effect on climatechange.”
body, set a course for airlines to offset emissions of international flights above a 2019-20 baseline. The pandemic led ICAO to scale back the program, CORSIA (for CarbonOffsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation), to make it easier for airlines to comply.
That means avoiding “greenwashing,” or false communications about environmental action. Greenwashing is a big problem. You’ve probably heard of greenwashing. We define greenwashing and explain why it hurts your company. What Is Greenwashing? Greenwashing can be either intentional or unintentional.
The European Council today announced today that it has reached an agreement on a series of proposals aimed at protecting consumers from greenwashing, setting requirements for companies to substantiate and verify claims and labels regarding the environmental attributes of products and services.
Lack of visibility and perceptions of “greenwashing”. Another risk associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy is that your efforts will be seen as insufficient, or overblown. “One of the lessons of economic history,” the authors assert, “is that successful incumbents can be swept away as a new era emerges.
Carbonoffset markets have always been complex and controversial instruments to fight climatechange. Reading this article, you will better understand the carbonoffsets market, carbonoffsets controversy and the key initiatives to follow. CarbonOffsets Markets size.
While almost a third of those questioned (33%) believed carbonoffsetting is a viable strategy for achieving net-zero emissions, just 37% have employed it as a strategy to reduce their businesses’ environmental impact. The full report and survey findings can be downloaded here.
So we will need carbon removals as well, through technology or natural carbon sinks.”. According to the landmark IPCC climatechange mitigation study released earlier this year, scenarios that limit warming to 1.5°C The post EU Commission Proposes Carbon Removal Certification Rules appeared first on ESG Today.
The state's environmental leadership also extends to climatechange mitigation policy. In 2011, enforcement began of the state's low-carbon fuel standard , the world's first. Acute and chronic physical climate risks facing California range from heatwaves to persistent drought, and a seemingly never-ending fire season.
This is generally a voluntarily self-imposed deadline, usually decades away, by which the institution’s emissions will not necessarily actually reduce to zero, but rather by which they will at least be ostensibly canceled out by carbonoffsets.
Matthew Shankland, Head of Sidley Austin’s London-based Disputes Resolution Practice, outlines how i nvestor s can mitigate against the increased risk of greenwashing-related issues in company advertising. Under English law, there is no specific cause of action for, or law governing, greenwashing.
United Airlines has committed to fully reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 without relying on carbonoffsets. The company also announced that it has begun showing customers booking flights on its website or app an estimate of the flight’s carbon footprint, with indications of lower carbon options based on itinerary.
Net-Zero Commitments In response to growing concerns about climatechange, the Government of Canada made a commitment to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. The voluntary carbon-offset market is rapidly evolving and is expected to grow to around $250 billion by 2050 from only $2 billion in 2020.
The Fine Print on Carbon Credits The definitions in the federal document take a fairly expansive view of “inefficient” subsidies that “encourage wasteful consumption, reduce our energy security, impede investment in clean energy sources, and undermine efforts to deal with the threat of climatechange,” as the G20 defined the term in 2009.
And how can businesses tackle them in order to pursue their climatechange goals? You can’t offset until you’ve reduced to the minimum. Businesses don’t need to make the choice between reducing carbon emissions and offsetting, they can do both in tandem. Reducing carbon emissions is boring and complicated.
Even though the climatechange and single use plastics (can you say plastic gloves?) discussions have been tabled to focus on this more immediate threat, it is important to remember that climatechange is still here. For those businesses, one of the steps to consider is calculating their carbon footprint.
Price and information are cited as biggest barriers to sustainable behavior change among consumers. Just 10% completely trust brand promises on climatechange and only 10% find it very easy to get reliable sustainability data. The survey finds climatechange skepticism is almost equally rife across the U.S.,
In 2022, the voice against “greenwashing” practices was clear and loud. Figure 2: Word Greenwashing rated 100 in popularity in 2022 – source Google Trends. Countries and companies have taken responsibility for climatechange and raised their carbon emissions reduction ambition.
Are carbon credits a legitimate tool to fight climatechange? Despite their growing popularity as a way for businesses and other carbon emitters to offset their own emissions by buying credits from other entities that reduce or remove carbon from the atmosphere, recent research has called their effectiveness into question.
The world’s leading authority on corporate climate plans has dealt a blow to the carbon-offset industry, signalling that it objects to corporations using carbon credits in place of emission reductions in their own supply chains.
A court forced Shell to reduce emissions, an activist investor forced ExxonMobil to replace three board members better suited to fight climatechange, and Chevron shareholders voted against their board to achieve faster-cut carbon emissions. 2 – CarbonOffset Markets price Hike. CarbonOffsets Market growth.
According to scientists achieving net-zero before 2050 is critical to keeping us safe from the catastrophic consequences of climatechange. The number of net-zero emissions commitments has doubled this year, as many prioritize climate action in their recovery from Covid-19 ( Data-Driven EnviroLab report). ETS in Europe).
But analysis by the emissions-modeling group Climate Interactive shows that even if we successfully deployed all the possible natural carbonoffsets in the world— without cutting emissions —we won’t limit warming below catastrophic levels. ”) It must be addressed.
Four years ago, a study published in the journal Science found that the restoration of forests could capture over 200 Gt of carbon – which could draw down approximately 30 percent of excess anthropogenic carbon.
The primary problem with the phrase ‘net zero’ is the first word, which introduces a fog of uncertainty and has encouraged many organisations to promise carbonoffsetting in the future instead of reducing emissions today. Carbonoffsetting, with all is faults and likely future scrutiny, accounts for 19% of the plan.
Regulators around the world are considering increasing their scrutiny of companies’ emissions-reduction claims in a bid to dispel greenwashing concerns. . Companies will have to maintain good corporate practice on climatechange, including a public commitment to reaching net zero by 2050.
Dr Torsten Schwarze, Partner at Morgan Lewis, explains how two EU directives will shape Europe’s legal framework to restrict greenwashing. ESG compliance is becoming increasingly important for companies, and the development of technologies and products to help reduce their carbon footprint has become a priority for many.
As an example of good practice, Turner cited the CarbonOffsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). “It Major corporate buyers stepped back from purchasing carbon credits as accusations of greenwashing grew. It moves relatively slowly – and when it does, it does so quite thoughtfully.”
The Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT), charged by the UK government with developing a “gold standard” for climate transition plans, should consider firms’ use of carbonoffsets, governance structures, capital allocation plans, alignment with financial statements, and lobbying activity, said UKSIF. “We
"People are beginning to ask more questions about how their money is working for them as it relates to financial returns, or how it might be working against them in the creation of extractive economies, climatechange or labor issues.". says Simon Konig, executive director of Climate Focus North America. billion acres to 1.9
Existing voluntary climate-related reporting guidance – such as that provided by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) and Climate Action 100+ (CA100+) – will inform the TPT’s efforts. . Throwing down the gauntlet . The latter is known as the ‘4 P’s’: pledge, plan, proceed and publish.
And there are wider issues around the VCMs already in operation, such as credit pricing, third-party verification and reducing the risk of greenwashing. . trillion by 2030, to boost resilience and deal with the loss and damage caused by climatechange impacts. . degrees of climatechange. .
Governments are being called on to put some regulatory muscle behind corporate net-zero pledges to ensure they don’t amount to mere greenwashing. . It comes at a challenging time for those who want more aggressive climate action. . We must have zero tolerance for net-zero greenwashing. -UN Photo by Collision Conf/Flickr.
Carbonoffsets are ‘riddled with fraud.’ Solving credibility issues may require a greater overhaul of carbon markets. Carbon insetting Business-speak for companies reducing emissions in their own supply chains; an alternative to carbonoffsetting. One reason 2023 was so hot (apart from climatechange)?
Something significant is happening in the desert in Egypt as countries meet at COP27 , the United Nations summit on climatechange. Climate finance has been one of the thorniest issues in global climate negotiations for decades, but I’m seeing four promising signs of progress at COP27. One year on, something is stirring.
Its an energy-intensive way of dealing with the climate crisiss effect on winter sports, requiring 72 cooling machines and 33 snowmaking machines to maintain optimal winter conditions under a roof. Or rather, does skiing have a future at all in a world thats being lashed by climatechange? Could this be the future of skiing?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content