This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 , the Government of Canada has invested billions of dollars in practical efforts to lessen the effects of climatechange and encourage clean economic growth. Together, a combined green and transition taxonomy can support a holistic approach to achieve a low-carbon transition.
Despite the improvements in disclosure and climate pledges, however, the study found that direct emissions from the companies have not declined this year, and are on track to significantly exceed those needed to achieve the global goal to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C.
Green hydrogen has huge potential and multiple use cases, but cost concerns and operational risks linger. The world’s net zero future depends on introducing and upscaling cleantechnologies to neutralise and/or replace the hardest-to-abate CO2 emissions produced by carbon-intensive industries. Circular argument.
Climate spending: funding shortfall FY2015/16–2023/24 “With this report, Corporate Knights has given us a valuable and readable scorecard that highlights federal government initiatives to address climatechange across departments and policy instruments. What was promised? What has been delivered?”
Climate spending: funding shortfall FY2015/16–2023/24 “With this report, Corporate Knights has given us a valuable and readable scorecard that highlights federal government initiatives to address climatechange across departments and policy instruments. What was promised? What has been delivered?”
This article was first published in Forbes The election of President Trump and the establishment of an administration closely tied to the fossil fuel industry is, without doubt, a major setback for global efforts to combat climatechange. Companies invest in countries that offer long-term policy that is consistent.
Costs for a lot of those technologies are falling fast. Companies are under pressure from their customers and investors to deal with climatechange. There is no denying that another Trump presidency will stall national efforts to tackle the climate crisis and protect the environment, but most U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content