This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Are you greenwashing, wishing or walking? Some boards approve, some feel comfortable doing so and are hoping for the best; others are afraid to be called out on greenwashing but approve them anyway, because "everyone else" are setting goals. Now, we are looking forward to COP26 in Glasgow and the stakes are high. ClimateChange.
Coming at the end of what is going down as the hottest year on record, it was easy to feel that the annual meetings of signatories to the 1992 UN Framework Convention on ClimateChange (UNFCCC), plus the circus of non-governmental organizations, lobbyists and negotiators that has grown up around them, have failed to deliver.
Late last year, in the wake of COP26, the U.K.’s s Association of Independent Music launched the Music Climate Pact , which was signed by all three major labels – Universal, Warner and Sony – along with large indies like Secretly Group and Ninja Tune. And they have to do it quickly.
Slow-to-change investors and greenwashers in the business community will lose their cover to continue propping up the fossil fuel economy. Some previously untargeted companies, brands, institutional investors and geographies will be thrust into the limelight as central problems in the battle against climatechange.
They will also require massive amounts of capital from financial markets that still don’t adequately value the risks and opportunities associated with climatechange. Net-zero commitments proliferated ahead of COP26, held last November in Glasgow. We’re very far from where we need to be. But the good news is we can get there.
Lord Patel said COP26 is “the perfect opportunity to highlight on the world stage the importance of nature-based solutions.” Pledges and financing risk being misdirected towards scientifically uncertain, poorly planned initiatives which have few lasting impacts other than to greenwash the activities of polluters.
Today the PR industry propping up the sector is considered one of the biggest obstructions to climatechange mitigation. As the medium goes digital and the message becomes more subtle and diffuse, pro-oil marketing is being baked into our social media feeds and infiltrating climate conferences.
In the developed world, countries still have to internalize, politically, that bills are coming due – both at home and abroad – after decades of delaying action on climatechange. Finance pledges and cries of ‘greenwashing’. But without more detail, the announcement attracted cries of “ greenwashing.”.
I’ve been involved in the climate negotiations for several years as a former senior U.N. The Energy Transitions Commission , a coalition of businesses and nongovernmental organizations, calculated that if the commitments made at COP26 are delivered, it will cut the gap between today and the 1.5 official and I am in Glasgow now.
Despite the undeniable evidence that the world is charting an increasingly dangerous climate course, world leaders once again missed a critical opportunity to act. Yet COP26 came and went without the detailed action plans required. What is required is systemic change. Above all, the climate emergency needs to be made personal.
And how can businesses tackle them in order to pursue their climatechange goals? Getting any advice is difficult as carbon consultants are busy post COP26 and we, like many businesses nationwide, have limited in-house capacity to do it ourselves – although we’re making changes there!
(Photo by Elena Mozhvilo on Unsplash ) Scaling Impact and Strengthening Accountability Toward Net Zero Through the B Corp Climate Collective Brigitta Nemes, Senior Manager Environmental Standards at B Lab Global, shares her reflections on a new direction for the B Corp Climate Collective’s work on net zero.
When it comes to gathering the collective will to tackle climatechange, it is often argued that public policy actions and private sector commitments are mutually reinforcing, spurring each side to go further and faster. Even so, we were reminded how far the G20 nations are from meeting their COP26 commitment to keep 1.5°C
Climate success requires laws that ensure consistent reporting on emissions reductions, writes Jane Thostrup Jagd of the We Mean Business Coalition. Debates are currently underway in both the EU and the US about how companies should report on the risks that climatechange is bringing to their business – and vice versa.
As a result, investors have increasingly relied on unregulated ratings firms and data providers to assess, among other ESG factors, the impact of climatechange on a company as well as the company’s own impact on the environment. Risk of greenwashing.
Investor engagement with companies on climatechange has come under the spotlight, with some warning of shortcomings with current processes. The effectiveness of asset owner and manager actions in tackling greenwashing by companies is seen as critical to the low-carbon transition. How should engagement work in principle?
Climate Action Tracker described the amended goal a “significant step forward from the previous 26% reduction target” but said a 60% reduction was needed to put Japan on a 1.5°C Adequate disclosure is critical if the ESG funds are to avoid “being ridiculed as “greenwashing”, it said.
Carbon offset markets have always been complex and controversial instruments to fight climatechange. Climate science is clear. We need to cut greenhouse emissions rapidly in this decade to avoid the catastrophic and unpredictable effects of climatechange. Offsetting is often a dangerous climate lie.
Jam open the closing window – The UN Environment Programme’s Emissions Gap Report 2022 was the most sobering of the many pre-COP27 analyses published this week, highlighting the inadequacy of our efforts to tackle the causes of climatechange. Current pledges will nudge global warming down from its present 2.8°C C course to 2.5°C
This builds onto the UK’s existing national commitments, such as the Glasgow Climate Pact from COP26, promising the 2020s to be a decade of action. Corporate climate best practice has largely been led by voluntary actions and non-legislative frameworks and drivers. o C remains highly uncertain.
Regulators around the world are considering increasing their scrutiny of companies’ emissions-reduction claims in a bid to dispel greenwashing concerns. . Companies will have to maintain good corporate practice on climatechange, including a public commitment to reaching net zero by 2050.
As some noted , legislative momentum on sustainability and climate was already slowing, just 100 days after COP26. While Europeans bemoan the lack of teeth in new corporate sustainability due diligence rules, the US is still struggling with climate disclosure rules, let alone green fund labelling or even carbon pricing.
Loss and damage relates to climate-related impacts which cannot be adapted to. Loss and damage is happening because we have not adequately tackled climatechange, cut emissions or taken action to adapt. There has been significant development on reporting standards since COP26.
In 2022, the voice against “greenwashing” practices was clear and loud. Figure 2: Word Greenwashing rated 100 in popularity in 2022 – source Google Trends. Countries and companies have taken responsibility for climatechange and raised their carbon emissions reduction ambition.
This March, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a sustainable business forum in Vancouver “things have changed” since the country signed up to the Paris Agreement on climatechange. But she adds: “That’s only for climate disclosures. It ignores that some investments are still enabling climatechange.
As one of the first countries to mandate TCFD-aligned reporting, then-Chancellor and now-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak unveiled the UK’s ambition to become the world’s first net zero financial centre at COP26 last November, with the intention to mandate transition plans as the first step. .
As one of the first countries to mandate TCFD-aligned reporting, then-Chancellor and now-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak unveiled the UK’s ambition to become the world’s first net zero financial centre at COP26 last November, with the intention to mandate transition plans as the first step. .
Chancellor Rishi Sunak unveiled the government’s ambition to become the world’s first net zero financial centre at COP26 last November, where he also announced the intention to mandate transition plans as the first step. According to Alexander, the SDR regime has the potential to take bold steps against greenwashing.
No mean achievement – This time last week we didn’t know whether there would even be a deal at COP27, let alone one dominated by an agreement to create a fund to pay loss and damages to countries suffering from the physical impacts of climatechange.
A court forced Shell to reduce emissions, an activist investor forced ExxonMobil to replace three board members better suited to fight climatechange, and Chevron shareholders voted against their board to achieve faster-cut carbon emissions. 4 – International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) announcement during COP26.
Two major topics of discussion on the agenda for COP27’s Finance Day were ‘Mobilising Finance for Climate Action’ and ‘From Ambition to Action: Mobilising Finance for Climate Solutions, Adaptation and Resilience’. It explains why activists and the public demand that the finance sector does more to address climatechange.
The aims of the UN’s Climate Action Pathway for Finance , published in advance of COP26 last year, are nothing if not ambitious. By 2050, its vision is for asset managers to have adjusted their business models to ensure that every financial decision takes climatechange into account.
Analysts will need to deal with the challenge that policies intended to combat climatechange will affect financial returns over a long time horizon. A more forensic and sophisticated analysis of net zero plans will be inevitable. Much of the burden of analysis will fall on the investment management industry. Biting the bullet.
According to scientists achieving net-zero before 2050 is critical to keeping us safe from the catastrophic consequences of climatechange. The number of net-zero emissions commitments has doubled this year, as many prioritize climate action in their recovery from Covid-19 ( Data-Driven EnviroLab report). ETS in Europe).
“Ongoing support from policymakers and wider stakeholders to assist companies in reporting against ISSB will be necessary we believe, particularly for smaller companies.” The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) SDRs aim to bring clarity on how the regulator will approach greenwashing, while also increasing transparency and trust in sustainable investment (..)
While progress was uneven, it was achieved against a radically changing geopolitical backdrop, and reinforced by moves in the US to mandate climate risk disclosures by corporates and discourage greenwashing by fund providers. COP26 revisited. It might not be perfect, but perhaps we should not expect it to be.
New mechanisms for keeping private sector climate promises have taken big steps forward at COP27 this week, while major banks provided limited visibility on their path to net zero. . The 17-member group is chaired by Catherine McKenna, a former Canadian Minister of Environment and ClimateChange. . “We
As they work towards their climate goals, companies must prioritize people – and the just transition has been a key theme at this COP. This will make greenwashing easier to detect and allow those companies that are really delivering on climate action to show their impact. In fact, this has been a COP of action.
At the same time, the credibility of their climate strategies has been brought into question both by greenwashing scandals and recent analyses of the Paris-alignment of fund offerings. . Phasing down and out . At the same time, frameworks are being developed to provide detailed guidance to investors.
Notably, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) – launched at COP26 in Glasgow in 2021 – has been tasked with developing a comprehensive global baseline of sustainability disclosures for the world’s capital markets. The good news is that developments are afoot that stand to usher in a more homogeneous future. .
Climatechange, environmental stewardship, these are very big systemic problems and issues to tackle. But then Typhoon Yolanda or Haiyan hit the Philippines, and that was when climatechange was no longer just this distant issue in the near future. It was impacting people who look like me, like my family members.
Not only did it set the tone for a wide range of adaptation initiatives throughout COP27, by focusing attention on the Global South it changed the narrative of climate diplomacy, helping to pave the way for the loss and damage fund , the proceeds of which will ultimately bolster physical defences against climatechange. .
These days, more and more analysts are equipped to inquire companies on major ESG topics such as climatechange, governance or social issues. The IFRS presented during COP26 the creation of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to drive international consistency of sustainability-related disclosures.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content