This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Investors are increasingly concerned about corporate greenwashing, with nearly all reporting that they believe corporate reporting on sustainability performance contains unsupported claims, according to a new survey by global professional services firm PwC, which also found that investors want more information on the cost of companies’ ESG commitments, (..)
Alongside the progress of a bill in California calling for fossil fuel divestment by public-sector pensions, and the SEC’s plans for climate-risk disclosures , this new assault on greenwashing moves US policy closer to its European counterparts, where fund disclosure rules are already reshaping the market.
For ESG-aware investors, this paucity of solid information leads to questions over whether they should they wait for information flows to improve, pinning hope on further action from regulators or legislators, or divest their holdings to avoid uncertainty over the climate risks in their portfolios. Potential evidence of greenwashing.
This resulted in concerns over greenwashing accusations and uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of sustainable investments. Even if some market players are hesitant now, Article 9 funds present a great market opportunity to align positive impact with returns expectations.
Pressure to divest is commonly applied by ESG-conscious investors who no longer want to be associated with these companies or fund them. However, in practice, divestment is not the best strategy to enact change or to have a meaningful impact.
This presents a compelling addressable market, argued Matt Christ, Portfolio Manager in Fixed Income at Ninety One. Ninety One has been among the first joiners of the World Benchmarking Alliance’s call on asset managers to review their approach to sustainable investing to ensure it does not unintentionally lead to divestment from EMs.
Appetite for impact was strong, guided by emerging frameworks, but the forces of inertia were present too, both internal and external. The Impact Investing Principles have been really helpful, especially given the increased scrutiny of funds and concerns over greenwashing. Impact through stewardship.
And the mayors of 12 cities — representing 36 million residents — announced their plans to divest from fossil fuels. While I am grateful for every company that commits to taking practical, meaningful, un-greenwashed action, the common thread of the visions advanced above is that they set the bar higher — even if just a little bit.
Pledges and plans – This was a potentially significant week in the fight against greenwashing , with UN Climate Change unveiling its ‘ recognition and accountability framework ’ – essentially a tool for monitoring and verifying the net zero pledges of non-state actors – at its Bonn Climate Conference.
These stories make political assertions—implicitly or explicitly—about the past, present, and future. The War on Want and London Mining group and Indigenous Environmental Network are nonprofits and coalitions leading research on extractive mining and fossil fuel divestment.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content