This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A coalition of environmental groups is calling on the federal government to regulate climate commitments made by banks and other financial institutions to avoid greenwashing and accelerate change. . Senator Rosa Galvez is also critical of the regulator ’ s approach.
So let’s set the record straight: these shareholder resolutions call for banks to adopt responsible guardrails for transition financing, and to insure against both greenwashing and over-exposure to risky lending practices. Proponents of the resolutions acknowledge the near-term need for fossil fuels.
To put this in context, BlackRock’s decarbonisation stewardship track launched with US$150 billion in assets under management, less than 2% of its total AUM. To have both stewardship teams meet with the same issuer, at best, does a disservice to more climate-conscious clients and, at worst, greenwashes the product altogether.
Direct litigation risks include challenging investors’ mismanagement of climate and biodiversity-related risk, breaches of fiduciary duty, greenwashing, or financing environmental and human rights-related harms.
The article took a full six years to finalize after the wider agreement was adopted, with international negotiators expressing grave concern about the risk of greenwashing and human rights violations, particularly for Indigenous and other local communities in the world’s poorest countries. Carbon Capture Backed by Carbon Offsets?
Direct litigation risks include challenging investors’ mismanagement of climate and biodiversity-related risk, breaches of fiduciary duty, greenwashing, or financing environmental and human rights-related harms.
The private sector’s ability to accelerate the pace of netzero transition is open to question. Perhaps these outcomes should not be a surprise after BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, described many 2022 climate resolutions as “ prescriptive or constraining ”.
As an example of the scale we are talking about, t he Glasgow Financial Alliance for NetZero (GFANZ), the world’s largest coalition of financial institutions committed to netzero, represents over $130 trillion of private capital. . This means disclosing opportunities and risks. What are the barriers to action?
For example, they may request assurance that the company won’t end up with strandedassets.”. Potential evidence of greenwashing. These differences could be evidence of greenwashing.”. Investors need to know how company balance sheets could change if we really are on a path to netzero.
CCUS and blue hydrogen inclusion seen as slowing Canada’s netzero transition, while finance leaders urge stakeholders to “get on with it”. Produced by Canada’s Sustainable Finance Action Council (SFAC) , the proposed framework outlines two categories for sustainability-focused investments.
In the statement it referred to metallurgical coal as “carbon steel materials”, drawing accusations of greenwashing. This leaves it heavily exposed to reputational, regulatory and stranded-asset risk, leading many investors to avoid it. For a carbon-intensive business, Glencore has relatively ambitious climate targets.
For investors and companies with assets within those key biodiversity areas, this raises the issue of strandedassets. Meanwhile, many have opted to retain their stakes and influence in other carbon-intensive firms as their netzero transition plans evolve.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a company transitioning to netzero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 or sooner is in want of a detailed plan. . How do they translate on a netzero journey? UK proposals to mandate climate transition plans are part of wider scrutiny effort. .
Mobilising public and private capital to fund the netzero transition efforts of emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) has been a central theme of discussions at COP27 in Egypt. . Will Kerry’s COP27 initiative drive EMDE energy transition and put voluntary carbon markets on the fast track to credibility? .
Leading US banks and insurers will face votes at their upcoming AGMs asking for policies aligned with the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) netzero roadmap , after challenges to shareholder resolutions were rejected. . Risk of strandedassets . said Kate Monahan, Director of Shareholder Advocacy? “In targets. .
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content